Converting to WordPress was like reading a fast paced highly addictive novel. I just finished it and it's bliss. Take a look at my bliss. Many thanks to Carthik, RandyWalker and another gentleman (I fail to remember) on irc.freenode.net#wordpress for a smooth transition.
Many thanks to all those who develop this product with a passion. Hats off.
A brand new day with WordPress (23 posts)
-
Chyetanya Kunte
Posted 7 years ago # -
Nicely done, I'm impressed.
-
Posted 7 years ago #unoamigo: gee, thanks!
-
gregor
Posted 7 years ago #Agreed ... Looking great! Congratulations!
-
Posted 7 years ago #thanks, gregor!
-
noahpb
Posted 7 years ago #Looks very nice. I'm looking at it with Firefox 0.9.1 and there is a small grey outlined box to the right of the header photo that doesn't look like it should be there.
-
Root
Posted 7 years ago #Looks cool. Welcome to WP. You are too modest on your blog. In a fortnight you will be hacking to death like the rest of us. :)
-
Anonymous
Posted 7 years ago #Nice and simple! 5 stars from me mate :)
-
Posted 7 years ago #noahpb: Thanks for those comments! I'm using firefox 0.9.1 too. looks okay to me, but I've noticed that grey patch in IE sometimes (actually header repeating), but not in Firefox. Try reload (as with any CSS layouts with border hacks). Seems to be working okay in Safari as well. I'm not on a Mac box, so I use this renderer: http://www.danvine.com/icapture/ .
Might be easiest way for people without Macs to see how their site looks like on Safari.
Root, Anonymous: Thanks, guys! -
Posted 7 years ago #This is a shame. There is a CSS positioning issue with the head graphic. It is not sizing consistently. In IE it is leaving white space at the right.
-
Posted 7 years ago #Hi Root, thanks for reminding me :) . I know this actually. It's a small graphic; not a positioning problem. I'm 50px short of the required head graphic size. It was supposed to be temporary until I get my image roller scripts and better (& cleaner) images ready. Damn, too busy at work to clean-up. Take care u guys :)
-
Posted 7 years ago #Resize in photoshop?
-
Posted 7 years ago #Nah. Its not the image. As I thought its the sizing. div#wrap has a combined width of 740px but a hack of 720. Dont you just love CSS?
-
Posted 7 years ago #It really is the image. Right click on it and check prop: 640px x 154px. It's supposed to be 700px width :) No photoshop. Too expensive for a hobbyist. More like Irfanview ;)
-
Posted 7 years ago #body has a min width of 700px :)
-
Posted 7 years ago #Well there you go. IE wont do min width.
-
Posted 7 years ago #agree but, there's plenty of padding to restrict look at:
div#wrap {
width: 700px;
Cheers! -
Posted 7 years ago #I have looked. And I know what I see.
-
Posted 7 years ago #Okay suspense solved. I just uploaded a new image: no change in the css. looks alright to me now ( i use IE6). As a matter of fact, I looked, it's not 50px, but the image was just 10px short. rest is on a overflow:hidden. so, any image greater than 650px fits just right in, no white patch on the right. have to work on images now.
-
looks great chetan!
-
Alan
Posted 7 years ago #Your site looks great. I need to figure out how you did your "archive" and "about" pages. Those are two features I still need to add to my dormant site. :)
-
wairoanz
Posted 7 years ago #Looking good, Chetan. I'd also like to know how your "archive" and "about" pages! Care to share? :)
-
Posted 7 years ago #Thanks to both of you, Chetan and Wairoanz....I may actually come close to having the site I've wanted. :)
Topic Closed
This topic has been closed to new replies.
