I’m sure. Less than .01% of sites with security holes ACTUALLY got hacked.
If you did get hacked, there are several other ways it probably happened. Secure your site!
Really, less than .01%? Then I guess my sites and tomhart’s site were the only ones hacked according to your math. And though there may be “several different ways” for a site to get hacked, there is documentation on the web that one can reference to recognize this specific one. Are you the developers mother or something? Why defend this plugin so vehemently when the problems have been well documented and reported? Do you think we are making this up?
Bloggers across the web have advised people to not use this plugin because of it’s history with security issues and the developer’s slow response. I did use it for a time and found it fit my needs, but in the long run, it turned out to cause me countless headaches and cost me countless hours
