Why are you using raquo as a page title separation? I realize it looks nice, but wouldn't a dash or colon look be more appropriate? I realize it looks cool, but it's a quote, not a separator.
Regards,
Christian
Why are you using raquo as a page title separation? I realize it looks nice, but wouldn't a dash or colon look be more appropriate? I realize it looks cool, but it's a quote, not a separator.
Regards,
Christian
(i don't get it ?)
It would be funny if it weren't such a sad commentary on the human species as a whole ;-)
Agreed.
And to actually answer the question, I think it's a matter of personal preference. Grammatically, it is incorrect, but so is any punctuation you use, because it's a fragment/title.
I like them because they're pretty.
I suppose I take issue with it because we work so hard to make our sites accessible and standards based. How does a raquo come across in a reader for the blind or smartphones or who knows what else? Wouldn't be more sensible to just use a : ? Perhaps I'm being silly here, but it does seem like a legitimate, if small, issue.
I never considered accessibility... it's a thought.
Items contained in quotes may take a different voice in readers for the blind to distinguish it as a quote. How would it deal with a single quote and no closing quote? I honestly don't know. Does anyone know someone who uses such a reader? Something to ponder I suppose.
In the meantime, anyone know offhand what file I edit to alter it in my own install?
Nevermind. Found it.
wp-includes/template-functions-general.php
line 93
i seriously think parameters like these should be accessible from some advanced panel that can be incorporated in the backend.
I got rid of raquo in the title tag through wp-includes/template-functions-general.php. but now i don't know how to get rid of the extra space in the title tag. you can take a look at the code. please help http://www.topretreat.com/index.php/escape-to-virginia-beach/
Umm, there's no need to go editing core files. The function itself is configurable. » is just the DEFAULT. You can use anything you want.
http://codex.wordpress.org/Template_Tags/wp_title
Example: here's " :: " being used: http://www.finalgear.com/news/2005/09/15/
I've had this thread in the back of my mind for some time. The "@" symbol caught on like gangbusters, for showing the relationship between a user and a domain -- but there's no similarly ubiquitous symbol for showing the relationship between a document/post and a domain/section.
I asked some mathematically inclined friends, in case they knew of a way of writing such relationships, and they said, "oh sure: Є"
Its either html entry & # 1 0 2 8 ; or & # 7 4 5 3 ; (i've had to space them out because neither backticks nor < code > seems to be working)
This symbol, when placed between x and y is used to say that x is part of y, where y is a set that contains y.
I thought it would be a good character to use in place of the one that is technically a quote.
Cool, dylan. Just COOL. We tend to forget the relationship factor that MADE the @ symbol so instantly obviously perfect.
Um. And before I go to make wholesale changes here: what's that thing actually CALLED? Does it have a name other than & # 1 0 2 8 ;?
I don't know what the name is... it looks like an Ukrainian palatalized E (read = ye). But it comes from the Old Greek "epsilon".
It's a lower-case epsilon. Probably because the "Є" is read as "element."
x Є y is read "x is an element of y."
Even cooler! I can probably remember that *laughs at self*....
Hmm. So is there an "upper case epsilon" then? Must be google time!
Well, the "upper case epsilon" is what became our (Latin) E.
Hmmm. The things they never taught one in school....
I'm not quite sure which symbol you tracked down, but ∋, (code number 8715) is the more correct character to use.
It is the opposite of the symbol you listed and is read "contains."
i.e.
Some Site ∋ A page
(read "some site contains a page")
There's also ∍ (8717), which is a smaller version of the same glyph.
And technically, the element symbol is not quite the same as an epsilon. According to the Unicode standard, a lower case epsilon is ε (949). My math professor actually writes epsilon this way to be sure it isn't confused with the element symbol. However, some people do write epsilon the same as an element symbol.
vkaryl - you probably never learned this because you never studied Greek. It's not a common school class. I only know because my Latin teacher was a Greek major, so when she didn't feel like teaching Latin one day, she taught us the Greek alphabet.
thenerdsangle
So, the chraracter I mentioned (code number 1028 ?) is for showing that X is contained by Y? Or did you only mean that it is only the mirror image of the character you mentioned(#8715)?
If not, is there a related symbol for "is contained by"?
It would be nice if there were, so that titles could be listed in either order: title first or section first.
I found these, sourtesty of the W3C
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/sgml/entities.html
<!ENTITY isin CDATA "∈" -- element of, U+2208 ISOtech -->
<!ENTITY notin CDATA "∉" -- not an element of, U+2209 ISOtech -->
<!ENTITY ni CDATA "∋" -- contains as member, U+220B ISOtech -->
<!ENTITY sub CDATA "⊂" -- subset of, U+2282 ISOtech -->
That last one would be useful to show that a category is contained within a larger structure.
This topic has been closed to new replies.