<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>WordPress &#8250; Support Topic: Legal analysis of the "plugins must be GPL'ed" claim</title>
<link>http://wordpress.org/support/</link>
<description>WordPress &#8250; Support Topic: Legal analysis of the "plugins must be GPL'ed" claim</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:09:48 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>xenon2050 on "Legal analysis of the "plugins must be GPL'ed" claim"</title>
<link>http://wordpress.org/support/topic/286794#post-1131804</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>xenon2050</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1131804@http://wordpress.org/support/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Sheesh, that is a long article. But worth a read.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>andreib on "Legal analysis of the "plugins must be GPL'ed" claim"</title>
<link>http://wordpress.org/support/topic/286794#post-1126818</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 15:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>andreib</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1126818@http://wordpress.org/support/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I found an article with a legal analysis of the &#34;plugins must be GPL'd&#34; claim (&#60;strong&#62;written by lawyers&#60;/strong&#62; for a change):&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.law.washington.edu/lct/swp/Law/derivative.html&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://www.law.washington.edu/lct/swp/Law/derivative.html&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;It call such claims &#34;absurd&#34;. It's a long article but it's well worth a read.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;(My apologies if this has already been discussed here in the past).
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
