<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>WordPress &#8250; Support Topic: Any advantage to having all loading items hosted locally?</title>
<link>http://wordpress.org/support/</link>
<description>WordPress &#8250; Support Topic: Any advantage to having all loading items hosted locally?</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:53:29 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>digitaltoast on "Any advantage to having all loading items hosted locally?"</title>
<link>http://wordpress.org/support/topic/257133#post-1029500</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 15:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>digitaltoast</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1029500@http://wordpress.org/support/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;With a large blog with loads of plugins that use javascript like sharethis, amazon images, google analytics etc etc, there are some 200 different connections being opened to different sites, and not all of them always load.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Would there be an advantage to copying all the javascript, amazon images etc locally, so that as much as possible was being pulled from the site?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I'm thinking that some systems/firewalls/routers have &#34;connection limits&#34;. Or am I thinking wrongly here?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
