<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>WordPress &#8250; Support Topic: [Plugin: Permalink Redirect] Is this plugin now obsoleted by your Canonical plugin?</title>
<link>http://wordpress.org/support/</link>
<description>WordPress &#8250; Support Topic: [Plugin: Permalink Redirect] Is this plugin now obsoleted by your Canonical plugin?</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:41:51 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>scribu on "[Plugin: Permalink Redirect] Is this plugin now obsoleted by your Canonical plugin?"</title>
<link>http://wordpress.org/support/topic/250807#post-1018242</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>scribu</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1018242@http://wordpress.org/support/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Not really. It just depends if you want to rely on canonical urls or canonical links put in your page head. Using both is redundant, though.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I prefer redirects because it also helps the visitor, not just the search engine.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>GuiltyCol on "[Plugin: Permalink Redirect] Is this plugin now obsoleted by your Canonical plugin?"</title>
<link>http://wordpress.org/support/topic/250807#post-1008950</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 09:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>GuiltyCol</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">1008950@http://wordpress.org/support/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Hi Joost,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I've just installed your Canonical URL plugin (thank you) and am wondering if that plugin effectively makes this permalink one obsolete now?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Cheers,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Col
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
