WordPress › Support Tag: wp-widget-cache

WordPress › Support Tag: wp-widget-cache http://wordpress.org/support/ WordPress › Support Tag: wp-widget-cache en Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:02:32 +0000 s0what on "[Plugin: WP Widget Cache] Widget Cache works only when Super Cache is turned off" http://wordpress.org/support/topic/333012#post-1285380 Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:32:50 +0000 s0what 1285380@http://wordpress.org/support/ I left field for cache expiration time empty in widget, but it is still cached by WP Super Cache. Everything works fine when I disable Super Cache. <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-widget-cache/" rel="nofollow">http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-widget-cache/</a> saharusa on "WP Widget Cache window gone after saving in wp version 2.8.0 to 2.8.6" http://wordpress.org/support/topic/331795#post-1281414 Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:55:42 +0000 saharusa 1281414@http://wordpress.org/support/ Hi there, There is a problem with wp version 2.8.0 to 2.8.6, after saving widget settings wp widget cache form is gone... while settings saved just fine, you'll need to reload the page to be able to configure it once again <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-widget-cache/" rel="nofollow">http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-widget-cache/</a> idolbloglive on "Is it possible to use both wp-super-cache and db-cache-reloaded simultaneously?" http://wordpress.org/support/topic/311599#post-1259853 Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:13:54 +0000 idolbloglive 1259853@http://wordpress.org/support/ I am running both DB Cache Reloaded and wp-supercache on the blog at the same time and I think with both my initial load times are a tad faster but cached pages are much faster. rschilt on "Is it possible to use both wp-super-cache and db-cache-reloaded simultaneously?" http://wordpress.org/support/topic/311599#post-1259349 Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:18:34 +0000 rschilt 1259349@http://wordpress.org/support/ Some additional findings to report: Running DB Cache Reloaded by itself yielded faster page load times than having both plugins enabled at the same time. Also, DB Cache Reloaded yielded faster page load times than WP Super Cache. I must admit that my pages are DB heavy with close an average of 100 sql queries (far too many I know). I have also turned on compression via my php.ini which should add to the improved response. For now I'm going to stick with DB Cache Reloaded and compression enabled. R rschilt on "Is it possible to use both wp-super-cache and db-cache-reloaded simultaneously?" http://wordpress.org/support/topic/311599#post-1259260 Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:44:40 +0000 rschilt 1259260@http://wordpress.org/support/ FYI... I have been testing both WP Super Cache (with caching turned on) and DB Cache Reloaded. So far the results are looking positive and do not have any issues to report. This is what I am running: Wordpress: 2.8.5 DB Cache Reloaded: 1.4.1 WP Super Cache: 0.9.7 One point of interest is that the number of cached queries is much higher when WP Super Cache is disabled (eg: admin user). I'm sure there's a technical explanation for this. If anyone out there has any further feedback on running this combination of caching plugins - I'd be very interested to hear what you have to say. R piter45 on "Is it possible to use both wp-super-cache and db-cache-reloaded simultaneously?" http://wordpress.org/support/topic/311599#post-1236087 Mon, 05 Oct 2009 19:32:25 +0000 piter45 1236087@http://wordpress.org/support/ Just a quick note: Right now I am testing db-cache-reloaded alone and I have to say it works pretty great :) WP-S-C disabled. I guess either using them both or merging them is not a good idea. But DB-Cache-Reloaded is definitely a great plugin. You should try it out! ambitionLab on "Is it possible to use both wp-super-cache and db-cache-reloaded simultaneously?" http://wordpress.org/support/topic/311599#post-1235939 Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:16:53 +0000 ambitionLab 1235939@http://wordpress.org/support/ It may be possible... but is it advisable? My main objective is to minimize CPU load on a very busy site. What I can't figure out is whether I should have just one or the other (which one lowers CPU load the most?), or both? Ipstenu on "Is it possible to use both wp-super-cache and db-cache-reloaded simultaneously?" http://wordpress.org/support/topic/311599#post-1235727 Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:14:59 +0000 Ipstenu 1235727@http://wordpress.org/support/ That sounds more like an issue with Gentoo and APC than WP-super-cache and APC. piter45 on "Is it possible to use both wp-super-cache and db-cache-reloaded simultaneously?" http://wordpress.org/support/topic/311599#post-1233590 Sat, 03 Oct 2009 10:59:00 +0000 piter45 1233590@http://wordpress.org/support/ I installed APC on a server running Gentoo, but it didn't seem to work. The apc.php shows only 1 page in the cache. Also when I try to run this command: "make test" it shows 3 failed tests instead of passed :/ Even tho everything seems to be installed correctly. I didn't have any installation errors. No idea what's wrong... Ipstenu on "Is it possible to use both wp-super-cache and db-cache-reloaded simultaneously?" http://wordpress.org/support/topic/311599#post-1231691 Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:28:00 +0000 Ipstenu 1231691@http://wordpress.org/support/ @piter45 I have APC running on a box with WP-S-C and no issues. Erunafailaro on "Is it possible to use both wp-super-cache and db-cache-reloaded simultaneously?" http://wordpress.org/support/topic/311599#post-1229942 Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:18:06 +0000 Erunafailaro 1229942@http://wordpress.org/support/ The plugins seem to work together nicely. I am using WP 2.8.4, WP Super Cache 0.9.6.1 and DB Cache Reloaded 1.0.1. I even have WP Widget Cache 0.25.2 running. Caching on WP is a lot of fun :-) Thanks to all you great cache-plugin-authors! piter45 on "Is it possible to use both wp-super-cache and db-cache-reloaded simultaneously?" http://wordpress.org/support/topic/311599#post-1223790 Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:24:55 +0000 piter45 1223790@http://wordpress.org/support/ I see. I am going to test the object cache. BTW, what about installing APC (Alternative PHP Cache)? donncha on "Is it possible to use both wp-super-cache and db-cache-reloaded simultaneously?" http://wordpress.org/support/topic/311599#post-1214009 Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:35:58 +0000 donncha 1214009@http://wordpress.org/support/ If db-cache-reloaded use the file advanced-cache.php? If it does then you'll have to merge the code from both projects. It probably isn't worth doing. WP Super Cache will save your CPU cycles too as whole pages are cached. You could use any object cache to cache queries and WordPress objects. I wrote about one of them <a href="http://ocaoimh.ie/looking-at-a-wpmu-object-cache/">here</a>. piter45 on "Is it possible to use both wp-super-cache and db-cache-reloaded simultaneously?" http://wordpress.org/support/topic/311599#post-1213620 Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:49:48 +0000 piter45 1213620@http://wordpress.org/support/ I've just tested db-cache-reloaded after switching from wp-super-cache and it seems to me that... Wp-Super-Cache is still faster with loading the whole pages, but I assume that DB-Cache-Reloaded reduces CPU load on the server, so my question is in the topic above. Also I received few HTTP 500 Internal errors in admin panel and the site itself. WP-Super-Cache is blazing fast. WP-Cache is also pretty fast for logged in users. DB-Cache-Reloaded's speed is rather slow, but It cached 90% of queries on every page. I guess it reduces the CPU load. Hm? <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/db-cache-reloaded/" rel="nofollow">http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/db-cache-reloaded/</a> LincolnAdams on "[Plugin: WP Widget Cache] Auto expire options no longer work" http://wordpress.org/support/topic/310512#post-1209943 Sun, 13 Sep 2009 05:06:01 +0000 LincolnAdams 1209943@http://wordpress.org/support/ Using 2.8.4, the auto expire options no longer cache anymore. Timed caches still seem to work properly though. Really hope this plugin will be updated for 2.8.4, as it has sped up my site better than Super Cache ever did. <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-widget-cache/" rel="nofollow">http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-widget-cache/</a> janvandam on "[Plugin: WP Widget Cache] Saving post leading to a blank page" http://wordpress.org/support/topic/221283#post-1188628 Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:59:18 +0000 janvandam 1188628@http://wordpress.org/support/ I do not have that widget installed, yet I'm having white pages after I updated or edited a post, and after I activated or deactivate a widget. I am using WP 2.8.4 Each time I have to press the backpage button in the browser a few times to be able to go back. First it seems that the page not has been activated or updated, so I have to go back again or reload the page. Can you help? stevemagruder on "[Plugin: WP Widget Cache] Great plugin, but a concern" http://wordpress.org/support/topic/303440#post-1184379 Sat, 22 Aug 2009 19:03:00 +0000 stevemagruder 1184379@http://wordpress.org/support/ I'm really liking this plugin, as it's rather powerful at letting me individually set the caching for each individual widget. However, my concern is about using this plugin with an overall caching plugin, such as Hyper Cache. Hyper Cache, for instance, caches the entire page. A problem arises when widgets are individually set to expire at an earlier time than the overall cache, or if the widget is set not to cache at all, in case it is expected to work dynamically (change with each page load). The overall caching defeats the purpose of WP Widget Cache. Is there a caching plugin that will only cache post/page content without touching the sidebars/widgets? <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-widget-cache/" rel="nofollow">http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-widget-cache/</a> eladkarako on "wp-widget-cache interrupt with those plugins" http://wordpress.org/support/topic/282927#post-1113002 Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:10:22 +0000 eladkarako 1113002@http://wordpress.org/support/ 1. SEO Friendly Images 2. Stray Random Quotes 3. WordPress Mobile Edition FINAL CONCLUSION => NOT RECOMMENDED ! STILL IN ALPHA PHASE. AndrewZhang on "[Plugin: WP Widget Cache] Hard coded widgets ... how to use widget cache?" http://wordpress.org/support/topic/273111#post-1100073 Fri, 12 Jun 2009 05:42:25 +0000 AndrewZhang 1100073@http://wordpress.org/support/ well, you should bind to some actions, like this function custom_clearwcache() { widget_cache_remove('<your widget id>'); } //go <a href="http://codex.wordpress.org/Plugin_API/Action_Reference" rel="nofollow">http://codex.wordpress.org/Plugin_API/Action_Reference</a> to find your actions $custom_action_arr=array("publish_page", "comment_post","comment_post","edit_comment","delete_comment","wp_set_comment_status"); foreach($custom_action_arr as $ca) { add_action($ca, custom_clearwcache); } rishk789 on "[Plugin: WP Widget Cache] Hard coded widgets ... how to use widget cache?" http://wordpress.org/support/topic/273111#post-1097848 Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:46:24 +0000 rishk789 1097848@http://wordpress.org/support/ I can confirm that this method works. I surrounded my code with <pre><code><?php while($widget_cache->wcache->save($widget_cache->get_widget_cache_key("12344321"),9999, array())) { ?> THE CODE <?php } ?></code></pre> I was wondering if there was an extra parameter to force this cache to expire whenever a comment gets added or a page gets updated. AndrewZhang on "[Plugin: WP Widget Cache] Apparently not MU-aware" http://wordpress.org/support/topic/267473#post-1096009 Tue, 09 Jun 2009 09:44:30 +0000 AndrewZhang 1096009@http://wordpress.org/support/ Hi, I can give some tips to make it work on MU, but I never test that. Basically it just add 'host' as a param a part of the cache and option key. on line 100 of widget-cache.php function wgc_get_option($key) { .... //$ops=get_option($key); change this line to $ops=get_option($_SERVER['HTTP_HOST'].'_'.$key); .... } on line 474 of widget-cache.php function get_widget_cache_key($id) { //$wckey="wgcache_".$id; change this line to $wckey="wgcache_".$_SERVER['HTTP_HOST'].'_'.$id; Hope this would work AndrewZhang on "[Plugin: WP Widget Cache] WordPress 2.8 Compatibility?" http://wordpress.org/support/topic/273652#post-1096004 Tue, 09 Jun 2009 09:39:09 +0000 AndrewZhang 1096004@http://wordpress.org/support/ I've trid the WP 2.8-RC1, seemed fine to me, if you got any issue, please left some comments on <a href="http://www.mashget.com/2008/09/01/wp-widget-cache-for-wordpress/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mashget.com/2008/09/01/wp-widget-cache-for-wordpress/</a> AndrewZhang on "[Plugin: WP Widget Cache] Hard coded widgets ... how to use widget cache?" http://wordpress.org/support/topic/273111#post-1096003 Tue, 09 Jun 2009 09:36:19 +0000 AndrewZhang 1096003@http://wordpress.org/support/ Well, I'm not sure what's the template tag, but I think you can surround the "tag" by some codes yourself, while($widget_cache->wcache->save($widget_cache->get_widget_cache_key(<your widget id, make it unique>), <the cache time, like 600, 3600.>, array()) { <here is your widget code> } Ovidiu on "[Plugin: WP Widget Cache] Apparently not MU-aware" http://wordpress.org/support/topic/267473#post-1095961 Tue, 09 Jun 2009 07:49:54 +0000 Ovidiu 1095961@http://wordpress.org/support/ unfortunately the author doesn't seem to be aware of the wordpress forums, I'll try and contact him via his homepage :-( Ovidiu on "[Plugin: WP Widget Cache] Hard coded widgets ... how to use widget cache?" http://wordpress.org/support/topic/273111#post-1095959 Tue, 09 Jun 2009 07:48:33 +0000 Ovidiu 1095959@http://wordpress.org/support/ I am not sure the author checks the wordpress forums btu I'd be itnerested in this question too :-( Ovidiu on "[Plugin: WP Widget Cache] WordPress 2.8 Compatibility?" http://wordpress.org/support/topic/273652#post-1095958 Tue, 09 Jun 2009 07:47:57 +0000 Ovidiu 1095958@http://wordpress.org/support/ any news? rishk789 on "[Plugin: WP Widget Cache] WordPress 2.8 Compatibility?" http://wordpress.org/support/topic/273652#post-1082996 Mon, 25 May 2009 15:45:25 +0000 rishk789 1082996@http://wordpress.org/support/ I've tried using this plugin with WP 2.8 beta 2, and it doesn't work (probably due to the new widget system). What's the status of the development on making this plugin compatible? houseofstrauss on "[Plugin: WP Widget Cache] Hard coded widgets ... how to use widget cache?" http://wordpress.org/support/topic/273111#post-1081311 Sat, 23 May 2009 07:49:34 +0000 houseofstrauss 1081311@http://wordpress.org/support/ Many of my widgets are called directly from a template tag in the sidebars. Is there any way I can cache these widgets using widget cache, as they don't appear in the widgets admin side. Thanks. <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-widget-cache/" rel="nofollow">http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-widget-cache/</a> spherical on "[Plugin: WP Widget Cache] Apparently not MU-aware" http://wordpress.org/support/topic/267473#post-1074802 Fri, 15 May 2009 07:02:04 +0000 spherical 1074802@http://wordpress.org/support/ The author would do well, instead of fixing this 'feature', _make_ it a feature and write another version that is MU aware. That, or put in a switch to turn on site-wide for a particular widget in a particular location; leaving all others to cache/refresh at their own rates individually. In order for this to work you'd only set the cache time equally for the one widget in all blogs and leave the time field empty (turns off caching) in all others that you don't want to appear in all blogs with the same content. So, you'd set the time to something relatively short and any updates would refresh at the specified time, updating them all. Pretty cool, though not what was intended at first, I'd wager. spherical on "[Plugin: WP Widget Cache] Apparently not MU-aware" http://wordpress.org/support/topic/267473#post-1063600 Sun, 03 May 2009 18:21:05 +0000 spherical 1063600@http://wordpress.org/support/ While it can be a feature, the individual settings for widgets carry across blog sites if they are in the same numbered sidebar. Setting them differently from another between users isn't possible if they are in the same position. It would also be a Big help if there were a global timeout on the config page, so that all would default to it unless individually changed. Other than that, it seems to be working great.