<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
		>
	<channel>
		<title>WordPress Ideas &#187; Topic: Use &quot;URI Templates&quot; for Permalink configuration</title>
		<link>http://wordpress.org/ideas/topic/use-uri-templates-for-permalink-configuration</link>
		<description>WordPress Ideas &#187; Topic: Use &quot;URI Templates&quot; for Permalink configuration</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1</generator>
				<atom:link href="http://wordpress.org/ideas/rss/topic/use-uri-templates-for-permalink-configuration" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>Paul Gregory on "Use &quot;URI Templates&quot; for Permalink configuration"</title>
			<link>http://wordpress.org/ideas/topic/use-uri-templates-for-permalink-configuration#post-16655</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 07:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Paul Gregory</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">16655@http://wordpress.org/ideas/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Idea is bad.</p>
<p>1) There is no "other future URL-related management software" that WP needs to prepare for interoperability with.</p>
<p>2) Current WP method has been the standard WP method for several years - therefore people will look to existing WordPress references for information on permalinks.</p>
<p>3) 'It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."' - and with only 4 revisions in 3 years this is not work that is progressing fast.</p>
<p>4) It's an *incomplete* draft, with a number of areas of relevance to WP simply saying "TBD".</p>
<p>5) Proposal seeks only to match on a cosmetic level the URI Template standard, under the delusion this is a significant step towards actually implementing the standard.</p>
<p>6) Idea therefore boils down to "use {} instead of %%". % is easier to find on keyboards than {}, and is unlikely to be mistaken for () or [].</p>
<p>So not even "Maybe Later" but "Not Core".
</p>]]></description>
					</item>
		<item>
			<title>Social Media Agency on "Use &quot;URI Templates&quot; for Permalink configuration"</title>
			<link>http://wordpress.org/ideas/topic/use-uri-templates-for-permalink-configuration#post-16639</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Social Media Agency</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">16639@http://wordpress.org/ideas/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I think their time could be better spent making the most popular permalink /%postname%/ more efficient instead of warning people that it will slow their WP down.  </p>
<p>I'm not sure they should run off and make a bunch of changes to support a draft that may never be adopted as a real standard.</p>
<p>Tommy<br />
<a href="http://www.thetargetedgroup.com/services/consulting.html">Social Media Strategy</a>
</p>]]></description>
					</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan McCue on "Use &quot;URI Templates&quot; for Permalink configuration"</title>
			<link>http://wordpress.org/ideas/topic/use-uri-templates-for-permalink-configuration#post-16440</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Ryan McCue</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">16440@http://wordpress.org/ideas/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Since the first I-D Mike linked to, <a href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gregorio-uritemplate/">the draft</a> has been updated (most recently, on the 8th of March) and it expires September 9, so I'd say it's still in the running.</p>
<p>That aside, it is still an I-D, so I think it's irrelevant for now.
</p>]]></description>
					</item>
		<item>
			<title>Aaron D. Campbell on "Use &quot;URI Templates&quot; for Permalink configuration"</title>
			<link>http://wordpress.org/ideas/topic/use-uri-templates-for-permalink-configuration#post-16407</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Aaron D. Campbell</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">16407@http://wordpress.org/ideas/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The specification linked to gives a 404.  Also, unless this really *did* become a widely accepted standard, I think it's time to close this.
</p>]]></description>
					</item>
		<item>
			<title>Rami Yushuvaev on "Use &quot;URI Templates&quot; for Permalink configuration"</title>
			<link>http://wordpress.org/ideas/topic/use-uri-templates-for-permalink-configuration#post-8622</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Rami Yushuvaev</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">8622@http://wordpress.org/ideas/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/ideas/topic.php?id=2486" rel="nofollow">http://wordpress.org/extend/ideas/topic.php?id=2486</a>
</p>]]></description>
					</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dgold on "Use &quot;URI Templates&quot; for Permalink configuration"</title>
			<link>http://wordpress.org/ideas/topic/use-uri-templates-for-permalink-configuration#post-7476</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Dgold</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7476@http://wordpress.org/ideas/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In any case, the options for permalinks need to be spelled-out on the Permalinks settings page of your wp-admin.  It used to be there, but now you have to cross-reference the codex, and unfortunately most new Users just stick with the default permalink choices instead of customizing.
</p>]]></description>
					</item>
		<item>
			<title>hargetheterrible on "Use &quot;URI Templates&quot; for Permalink configuration"</title>
			<link>http://wordpress.org/ideas/topic/use-uri-templates-for-permalink-configuration#post-7475</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 09:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>hargetheterrible</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7475@http://wordpress.org/ideas/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It will make developers life a lot easier if URI templates would be included in Wordpress.
</p>]]></description>
					</item>
		<item>
			<title>h3h on "Use &quot;URI Templates&quot; for Permalink configuration"</title>
			<link>http://wordpress.org/ideas/topic/use-uri-templates-for-permalink-configuration#post-2026</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 01:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>h3h</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">2026@http://wordpress.org/ideas/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It has a lot to do with WordPress -- the permalinks are specified on the Permalinks Options page in the admin interface.</p>
<p>+1
</p>]]></description>
					</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jonathan Landrum on "Use &quot;URI Templates&quot; for Permalink configuration"</title>
			<link>http://wordpress.org/ideas/topic/use-uri-templates-for-permalink-configuration#post-2009</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 19:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Jonathan Landrum</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">2009@http://wordpress.org/ideas/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>What does that have to do with WordPress? I'm pretty sure the developers can use whatever they want there, so long as they code the program to recognize those symbols.
</p>]]></description>
					</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mike Schinkel on "Use &quot;URI Templates&quot; for Permalink configuration"</title>
			<link>http://wordpress.org/ideas/topic/use-uri-templates-for-permalink-configuration#post-1985</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 05:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Mike Schinkel</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">1985@http://wordpress.org/ideas/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>There is a IETF draft specification that is likely to become a standard for specify URL patterns called "URI Templates" [1]. At a high level it differs from current Permalink configuration by using braces "{}" instead of percent signs "%%" as delimiters:</p>
<p>   /%year%/%monthnum%/%day%/%postname%/<br />
   /{year}/{monthnum}/{day}/{postname}/</p>
<p>Doing this will prepare for interoperability with other future URL-related management software.</p>
<p>[1] <a href="http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gregorio-uritemplate-00.txt" rel="nofollow">http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gregorio-uritemplate-00.txt</a>
</p>]]></description>
					</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
