<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
		>
	<channel>
		<title>WordPress Ideas &#187; Topic: Security Patches for Earlier Versions</title>
		<link>http://wordpress.org/ideas/topic/security-patches-for-earlier-versions</link>
		<description>WordPress Ideas &#187; Topic: Security Patches for Earlier Versions</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 09:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1</generator>
				<atom:link href="http://wordpress.org/ideas/rss/topic/security-patches-for-earlier-versions" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>Jen Mylo on "Security Patches for Earlier Versions"</title>
			<link>http://wordpress.org/ideas/topic/security-patches-for-earlier-versions#post-16183</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 04:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Jen Mylo</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">16183@http://wordpress.org/ideas/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>If you were using 2.5 a year ago, you were already several versions behind. Everything got easier with 2.7, and more so with 2.8 and 2.9. You should just upgrade.
</p>]]></description>
					</item>
		<item>
			<title>Simon Dickson on "Security Patches for Earlier Versions"</title>
			<link>http://wordpress.org/ideas/topic/security-patches-for-earlier-versions#post-5670</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 11:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Simon Dickson</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">5670@http://wordpress.org/ideas/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I wholeheartedly agree with StrangeAttractor here. I do a lot of work with large corporations, building complex WordPress-based websites which tend to rely heavily on plugins. But often there's no guarantee that a given plugin will ever be updated, and a new WP release could therefore completely undermine a site's core functionality. I simply can't say to clients: 'go ahead and upgrade, nothing can possibly go wrong.'</p>
<p>The perfect model, surely, is Ubuntu's LTS (long term support): a commitment to keep certain releases patched for an extended period of time (3-5 years).</p>
<p>It means you can <em>guarantee</em> clients that they can keep patching their installations for security, without the risk of breaking key functions. <em>At the moment, we just can't say that.</em></p>
<p>v2.5 is a landmark release. This would be the ideal time to designate it as LTS. It's the one weak link in the WordPress proposition, and it would be easily closed.</p>
<p>I've written a bit more about this on my own blog:<br />
<a href="http://puffbox.com/?p=138">http://puffbox.com/?p=138</a>
</p>]]></description>
					</item>
		<item>
			<title>Anatis on "Security Patches for Earlier Versions"</title>
			<link>http://wordpress.org/ideas/topic/security-patches-for-earlier-versions#post-5659</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 18:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Anatis</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">5659@http://wordpress.org/ideas/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>As I am going back to 2.3.3 (I hate 2.5's admin area too much to keep it running!) I vote for security releases for previous versions.</p>
<p>If the admin area doesn't change... then I'm staying on 2.3.3 and sorry, but when one day this version is too outdated to get anything to work... I'll likely install a current version... and if it's no good, I'll be looking for new blog software.
</p>]]></description>
					</item>
		<item>
			<title>StrangeAttractor on "Security Patches for Earlier Versions"</title>
			<link>http://wordpress.org/ideas/topic/security-patches-for-earlier-versions#post-5418</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>StrangeAttractor</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">5418@http://wordpress.org/ideas/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>There's an interesting discussion of security and updates on Matt's most recent entry on his blog:</p>
<p><a href="http://ma.tt/2008/04/securityfocus-sql-injection-bogus/" rel="nofollow">http://ma.tt/2008/04/securityfocus-sql-injection-bogus/</a>
</p>]]></description>
					</item>
		<item>
			<title>StrangeAttractor on "Security Patches for Earlier Versions"</title>
			<link>http://wordpress.org/ideas/topic/security-patches-for-earlier-versions#post-5199</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 04:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>StrangeAttractor</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">5199@http://wordpress.org/ideas/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that's what I've been doing.  Actually, mostly sticking with 2.2.3.
</p>]]></description>
					</item>
		<item>
			<title>dangrey on "Security Patches for Earlier Versions"</title>
			<link>http://wordpress.org/ideas/topic/security-patches-for-earlier-versions#post-5126</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>dangrey</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">5126@http://wordpress.org/ideas/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Use version 2.0 LTS
</p>]]></description>
					</item>
		<item>
			<title>StrangeAttractor on "Security Patches for Earlier Versions"</title>
			<link>http://wordpress.org/ideas/topic/security-patches-for-earlier-versions#post-5118</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>StrangeAttractor</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">5118@http://wordpress.org/ideas/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>One thing that drives me crazy about WordPress are the frequent version upgrades. (I'm glad, of course, that WP continues to evolve.) It can be a real pain to upgrade when you have a lot of customizations and plugins -- and after all, one of the great things about WP is that it is so customizable.</p>
<p>I'm not eager to upgrade some of the sites I've built with older versions of WP -- why fix it if it works?</p>
<p>However, there is the issue of site security, and this is the main motivation to upgrade to a later version.  Holes in security are often addressed by the next version.</p>
<p>What I would like is to have the option to simply install a security patch, or a few core files that address the security issues, without upgrading the entire version of an installation.</p>
<p>It seems to me that this is in everyone's interest because many people don't upgrade their installations, and thus are vulnerable to security issues -- which can give WordPress a reputation of being insecure.</p>
<p>Maybe there's already a way to do this (and if so, please post the relevant info), but it certainly isn't obvious.
</p>]]></description>
					</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
