<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
		>
	<channel>
		<title>WordPress Ideas &#187; Topic: Include Sandbox</title>
		<link>http://wordpress.org/ideas/topic/include-sandbox</link>
		<description>WordPress Ideas &#187; Topic: Include Sandbox</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 10:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1</generator>
				<atom:link href="http://wordpress.org/ideas/rss/topic/include-sandbox" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>Jen Mylo on "Include Sandbox"</title>
			<link>http://wordpress.org/ideas/topic/include-sandbox/page/2#post-15797</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 12:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Jen Mylo</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">15797@http://wordpress.org/ideas/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>We're moving to a model with a new default theme each year that will have the most current coding standards and show how to use new features. Bundling Sandbox would no longer be appropriate.
</p>]]></description>
					</item>
		<item>
			<title>gilliancs on "Include Sandbox"</title>
			<link>http://wordpress.org/ideas/topic/include-sandbox/page/2#post-7658</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>gilliancs</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7658@http://wordpress.org/ideas/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I agree; a new blogger should be able to start out of the box with a choice of well-coded good-looking themes.
</p>]]></description>
					</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dgold on "Include Sandbox"</title>
			<link>http://wordpress.org/ideas/topic/include-sandbox/page/2#post-7478</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Dgold</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">7478@http://wordpress.org/ideas/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Any action in the default packed themes with WP 2.7?  This area of WP needs to be modernized with a sweet new default theme.
</p>]]></description>
					</item>
		<item>
			<title>danielwalters6 on "Include Sandbox"</title>
			<link>http://wordpress.org/ideas/topic/include-sandbox/page/2#post-5537</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>danielwalters6</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">5537@http://wordpress.org/ideas/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Could be worth including as a standard - although I thought the idea of wordpress was to keep everything as slimline as possible. - Including extra themes that are so simple to install (my grandmother has installed a wp theme before!) - this goes against the idea of keeping stuff slimline and is there any point?</p>
<p>Perhaps within the 5 minute installtion the sandbox theme should be mentioned? - This allows people to download wordpress and then the sandbox theme, should they want it....
</p>]]></description>
					</item>
		<item>
			<title>saltlakejohn on "Include Sandbox"</title>
			<link>http://wordpress.org/ideas/topic/include-sandbox/page/2#post-5505</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 02:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>saltlakejohn</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">5505@http://wordpress.org/ideas/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Sandbox is clean code, semantically correct, and built from the ground up to incorporate current "best practice" design elements. The variety of CSS-only appearance changes is staggering.
</p>]]></description>
					</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jon Bourne on "Include Sandbox"</title>
			<link>http://wordpress.org/ideas/topic/include-sandbox/page/2#post-2045</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Jon Bourne</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">2045@http://wordpress.org/ideas/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Retire the standard Kubrick and make a Kubrick lookalike from Sandbox as the default, and only, prepackaged theme.
</p>]]></description>
					</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mark on "Include Sandbox"</title>
			<link>http://wordpress.org/ideas/topic/include-sandbox/page/2#post-1668</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 08:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">1668@http://wordpress.org/ideas/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>DanAtkinson, tomthewebmaster: the idea is apparently about a <em>theme</em> called sandbox, not about adding fancy sandbox/AJAX funtionality for live testing.
</p>]]></description>
					</item>
		<item>
			<title>sshrdp on "Include Sandbox"</title>
			<link>http://wordpress.org/ideas/topic/include-sandbox/page/2#post-1089</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>sshrdp</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">1089@http://wordpress.org/ideas/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>And I think it is better to move Kubrick theme to Sandbox and let Sandbox be the only theme shipped with WP.
</p>]]></description>
					</item>
		<item>
			<title>Tom Lany on "Include Sandbox"</title>
			<link>http://wordpress.org/ideas/topic/include-sandbox#post-1043</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 06:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Tom Lany</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">1043@http://wordpress.org/ideas/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of a sandbox.  I have another blog setup for testing.  It is sometimes hard to have multiple blogs and databases (moving files, ect).
</p>]]></description>
					</item>
		<item>
			<title>DanAtkinson on "Include Sandbox"</title>
			<link>http://wordpress.org/ideas/topic/include-sandbox#post-736</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 12:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>DanAtkinson</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">736@http://wordpress.org/ideas/</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a good thing!</p>
<p>I have my dev box running as a mirror for my live site, but sometimes I think it'd be less hassle if I could just do it all in a live atmosphere where I could drag the loop into a  page, and style around it. Adding a little AJAX into the mix would be great, because it would be able to simulate live data on the fly.
</p>]]></description>
					</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
