<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Version Skip</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wordpress.org/development/2004/12/version-skip/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wordpress.org/development/2004/12/version-skip/</link>
	<description>WordPress development and updates</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 00:50:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9-rare</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Why is the next version of WordPress 1.5 and not 1.3? - Somefoolwit_habari</title>
		<link>http://wordpress.org/development/2004/12/version-skip/comment-page-4/#comment-39603</link>
		<dc:creator>Why is the next version of WordPress 1.5 and not 1.3? - Somefoolwit_habari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.org/development/2004/12/version-skip/#comment-39603</guid>
		<description>[...] Well.... obviously if you take the 1st and 5th letters of WordPress they are W and P - WP - thats it, simple. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Well&#8230;. obviously if you take the 1st and 5th letters of WordPress they are W and P &#8211; WP &#8211; thats it, simple. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why is the next version of WordPress 1.5 and not 1.3? - Somefoolwith_ahabari</title>
		<link>http://wordpress.org/development/2004/12/version-skip/comment-page-4/#comment-35891</link>
		<dc:creator>Why is the next version of WordPress 1.5 and not 1.3? - Somefoolwith_ahabari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 19:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.org/development/2004/12/version-skip/#comment-35891</guid>
		<description>[...] Well.... obviously if you take the 1st and 5th letters of WordPress they are W and P - WP - thats it, simple. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Well&#8230;. obviously if you take the 1st and 5th letters of WordPress they are W and P &#8211; WP &#8211; thats it, simple. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evolution : Tangled up in Purple</title>
		<link>http://wordpress.org/development/2004/12/version-skip/comment-page-4/#comment-26586</link>
		<dc:creator>Evolution : Tangled up in Purple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 09:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.org/development/2004/12/version-skip/#comment-26586</guid>
		<description>[...] what still has &#8220;dynamic, living use” in this website. Version 2.5 of Wordpress (back to skipping version numbers) is due out in a couple of days and that gives me a perfect excuse to do some house [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] what still has &#8220;dynamic, living use” in this website. Version 2.5 of Wordpress (back to skipping version numbers) is due out in a couple of days and that gives me a perfect excuse to do some house [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Games, PHP and other News</title>
		<link>http://wordpress.org/development/2004/12/version-skip/comment-page-4/#comment-6221</link>
		<dc:creator>Games, PHP and other News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 11:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.org/development/2004/12/version-skip/#comment-6221</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Wordpress Version Skip&lt;/strong&gt;

As noted on the development blog, Wordpress just switched development version numbers from 1.3 to 1.5. There are rumors going around why they did that. The main reason:
Something went terribly wrong.
Word has it that the Wordpress core development team...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Wordpress Version Skip</strong></p>
<p>As noted on the development blog, Wordpress just switched development version numbers from 1.3 to 1.5. There are rumors going around why they did that. The main reason:<br />
Something went terribly wrong.<br />
Word has it that the Wordpress core development team&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: //beconfused</title>
		<link>http://wordpress.org/development/2004/12/version-skip/comment-page-4/#comment-5647</link>
		<dc:creator>//beconfused</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 15:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.org/development/2004/12/version-skip/#comment-5647</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;point//three&lt;/strong&gt;

	WordPress jumps to 1.5!
 ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>point//three</strong></p>
<p>	WordPress jumps to 1.5!<br />
 &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WordPress 1.5 &#8220;Strayhorn&#8221; at Olympus Mons</title>
		<link>http://wordpress.org/development/2004/12/version-skip/comment-page-4/#comment-4733</link>
		<dc:creator>WordPress 1.5 &#8220;Strayhorn&#8221; at Olympus Mons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.org/development/2004/12/version-skip/#comment-4733</guid>
		<description>[...] Well, the long awaited WordPress 1.5 is out. They skipped 1.3 and 1.4. Not sure why. But I just clicked on that link and will copy some of the reasons: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Well, the long awaited WordPress 1.5 is out. They skipped 1.3 and 1.4. Not sure why. But I just clicked on that link and will copy some of the reasons: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JonCellini.com</title>
		<link>http://wordpress.org/development/2004/12/version-skip/comment-page-4/#comment-4593</link>
		<dc:creator>JonCellini.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 06:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.org/development/2004/12/version-skip/#comment-4593</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;WordPress 1.5&lt;/strong&gt;

If they were Sun it would probably be called version 5.0 instead of 1.5 

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>WordPress 1.5</strong></p>
<p>If they were Sun it would probably be called version 5.0 instead of 1.5 </p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Accettura's Fun With Wordage</title>
		<link>http://wordpress.org/development/2004/12/version-skip/comment-page-3/#comment-3050</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Accettura's Fun With Wordage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2005 23:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.org/development/2004/12/version-skip/#comment-3050</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Word Press 1.5 A first look...&lt;/strong&gt;

I decided I needed some geeky play time this evening, so I downloaded the latest cvs build of WordPress (yes they skipped numbers) and ran it in a dev environment, just for me to look, polk, and play.  I&#8217;m floored.  A rundown of what I see/like:
...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Word Press 1.5 A first look&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I decided I needed some geeky play time this evening, so I downloaded the latest cvs build of WordPress (yes they skipped numbers) and ran it in a dev environment, just for me to look, polk, and play.  I&#8217;m floored.  A rundown of what I see/like:<br />
&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Accettura's Fun With Wordage</title>
		<link>http://wordpress.org/development/2004/12/version-skip/comment-page-3/#comment-2919</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Accettura's Fun With Wordage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 19:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.org/development/2004/12/version-skip/#comment-2919</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Word Press 1.5 A first look&lt;/strong&gt;

	I decided I needed some geeky play time this evening, so I downloaded the latest cvs build of WordPress (yes they skipped numbers) and ran it in a dev environment, just for me to look, polk, and play.  I&#8217;m floored.  A rundown of what I see/like:...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Word Press 1.5 A first look</strong></p>
<p>	I decided I needed some geeky play time this evening, so I downloaded the latest cvs build of WordPress (yes they skipped numbers) and ran it in a dev environment, just for me to look, polk, and play.  I&#8217;m floored.  A rundown of what I see/like:&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blog&#124;openheads :: WordPress 1.5 je venku</title>
		<link>http://wordpress.org/development/2004/12/version-skip/comment-page-3/#comment-2864</link>
		<dc:creator>blog&#124;openheads :: WordPress 1.5 je venku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 17:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordpress.org/development/2004/12/version-skip/#comment-2864</guid>
		<description>[...] Tak je koneÄ?nÄ› venku dlouho oÄ?ekÃ¡vanÃ¡ novÃ¡ verze tohoto skvÄ›lÃ©ho a velmi oblÃ­benÃ©ho blogovÃ¡tka, kterÃ© pouÅ¾Ã­vÃ¡me i na tomto blogu  . My uÅ¾ jsme nÄ›jakÃ½ Ä?as pouÅ¾Ã­vali CVS verzi 1.5, takÅ¾e novÃ© funkce mÃ¡me zmÃ¡knutÃ©  . PÅ™ed touto verzÃ­ byla poslednÃ­ stabilnÃ­ 1.2.2. Verze 1.3 byla vynechÃ¡na. Pravdou je, Å¾e toto vÃ½ranÃ© povÃ½Å¡enÃ­ verze je zaslouÅ¾enÃ©. WordPress prodÄ›lal mnoho zmÄ›n. Bylo toho hodnÄ› pÅ™epsÃ¡no a pÅ™ibylo mnoho novinek, ale changelog zatÃ­m nenÃ­ doplnÄ›n  . &#160;&#160; od duxford [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tak je koneÄ?nÄ› venku dlouho oÄ?ekÃ¡vanÃ¡ novÃ¡ verze tohoto skvÄ›lÃ©ho a velmi oblÃ­benÃ©ho blogovÃ¡tka, kterÃ© pouÅ¾Ã­vÃ¡me i na tomto blogu  . My uÅ¾ jsme nÄ›jakÃ½ Ä?as pouÅ¾Ã­vali CVS verzi 1.5, takÅ¾e novÃ© funkce mÃ¡me zmÃ¡knutÃ©  . PÅ™ed touto verzÃ­ byla poslednÃ­ stabilnÃ­ 1.2.2. Verze 1.3 byla vynechÃ¡na. Pravdou je, Å¾e toto vÃ½ranÃ© povÃ½Å¡enÃ­ verze je zaslouÅ¾enÃ©. WordPress prodÄ›lal mnoho zmÄ›n. Bylo toho hodnÄ› pÅ™epsÃ¡no a pÅ™ibylo mnoho novinek, ale changelog zatÃ­m nenÃ­ doplnÄ›n  . &nbsp;&nbsp; od duxford [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
